Monoclonal Antibodies

Browse the articles related to this topic below.

Covid-19 vaccines and treatments: we must have raw data, now – BMJ

Post author By EvidenceNotFear
Post date 26 January 2022

In the pages of The BMJ a decade ago, in the middle of a different pandemic, it came to light that governments around the world had spent billions stockpiling antivirals for influenza that had not been shown to reduce the risk of complications, hospital admissions, or death. The majority of trials that underpinned regulatory approval and government stockpiling of oseltamivir (Tamiflu) were sponsored by the manufacturer; most were unpublished, those that were published were ghostwritten by writers paid by the manufacturer, the people listed as principal authors lacked access to the raw data, and academics who requested access to the data for independent analysis were denied.

https://web.archive.org/web/20220120011239/https://www.bmj.com/content/376/bmj.o102

Alternative Media Opinion

Who Do You Trust If You Can’t Trust the Science? — Mythbusting Whether Flu Was Rebranded as Covid

Post author By EvidenceNotFear
Post date 14 January 2022

One of the checks and balances on rampant bad scientific research is to continuously assess how new ideas fit into the framework of the bigger picture. A new piece of information may seem perfectly reasonable and well-documented, but the domino effect of its implications gives you another way to test its validity. When multiple lines of seemingly rock-solid evidence contradict one another, that’s a good sign that something is wrong, even if you don’t yet know why. Whenever a thread seems out of place, it’s time to pull on that thread until you can figure out what exactly is going on.

…”Trusting the science” is not (and never has been) about trusting results or trusting experts. Trusting the scientists is what got us into this mess. For science to function properly, we must NOT trust the scientists. Instead, we must trust in the messy self-correcting process that allows truth to boil to the surface even if every participant in that process is flawed.

“Science is the belief in the ignorance of the Experts”
— Richard P. Feynman
Science is the relentless competition between measurable pieces of evidence, the ruthless gauntlet of debate, the willingness to question even the most “obvious” of assumptions, and the humbleness to test and retest any and all assumptions against hard evidence, most especially when those assumptions are our own.

https://www.juliusruechel.com/2022/01/who-do-you-trust-if-you-cant-trust.html

Videos

Dr Peter McCullough with Joe Rogan – The Joe Rogan Experience 1747

Post author By EvidenceNotFear
Post date 13 December 2021

Dr. Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH, is a board-certified cardiologist who has testified before committees of the US and Texas Senate regarding the treatment of COVID-19 and management of the ongoing pandemic.

Backup mirrors:

Tags Age Groups, Antibodies, Approval, Asymptomatic, Authoritarianism, B Cells, BBC, Betadine, BioNTech, Care Homes, Civil Liberties, Conspiracy, Conspiracy Theories, COVID-19, D-Dimer Test, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, Dr. Peter McCullough, Early Treatment Protocols, Efficacy, Face Masks, False Positive, Fat Cells, FDA, Financial Incentives, Government, Hydrogen Peroxide, Immune Escape, Immune Response, Immunity, Influenza, Joe Rogan, Lockdown, Malfeasance, Mandatory Vaccination, Medical Malpractice, Misinformation, Moderna, Monoclonal Antibodies, mRNA, Natural Immunity, Obesity, Omicron Variant, Oral-Nasal Decontamination, PCR, Pfizer, Policy, Propaganda, Regulatory Capture, Reinfection, remdesivir, Side-effects, Spike Protein, T Cells, T-Detect Test, Transmissability Rate, Treatment, Trusted News Initiative, Truth in Advertising Act, Under-Reporting, Vaccination, Vaccine Damage, VAERS, Variants

Videos

Dr. Peter McCullough interview by John Leake

Post author By EvidenceNotFear
Post date 12 June 2021

Dr. Peter McCullough has been the world’s most prominent and vocal advocate for early outpatient treatment of SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) infection in order to prevent hospitalization and death. On May 19, 2021, I interviewed him about his efforts as a treating physician and researcher. From his unique vantage point, he has observed and documented a profoundly disturbing policy response to the pandemic—a policy response that may prove to be the greatest malpractice and malfeasance in the history of medicine and public health.”

Link to interview audio format released by Julian Charles of The Mind Renewed podcast.

Backup mirror:

Tags Academia, Age Groups, Aspirin, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Blood Clots, Budesonide, Censorship, Coercion, Colchicine, Conspiracy, COVID-19, Cytokine Storm, Dr. Peter McCullough, Dr. Richard Bartlett, Ebola, Elderly, Errors, Favipiravir, Financial Incentives, Health Care Workers, Hydroxychloroquine, Influenza, Isolation, Italy, Ivermectin, John Leake, Lancet, Medical Experts, Medical Industry, Medical Malpractice, Monoclonal Antibodies, NIH, Nutraceuticals, Peer Pressure, Peer-Review, Randomized Controlled Trials, Recovery Trial, Response, SARS-CoV-2, Spike Protein, STOIC Trial, The Hill, The New England Journal of Medicine, Treatment, USA, Vaccination, Vaccine Damage, Vaccine Hesitancy, Vaccine Passports, Ventilators, Vitamin C, Vitamin D, Zinc