Experts warn UK against ‘blindly’ following US in jabbing healthy five-year-olds against Covid because the reasons are ‘scientifically weak’ — as FDA panel approves Pfizer’s vaccine for primary school-aged children – Daily Mail

Post author By EvidenceNotFear
Post date 27 October 2021

Arguments to vaccinate children as young as five against Covid are ‘scientifically weak’, British experts claimed today after the US moved closer to jabbing infants.

…Professor David Livermore, a medical microbiologist at the University of East Anglia told MailOnline: ‘Vaccinating children to protect adults via herd immunity is ethically dubious and is scientifically weak.’

…Professor Russell Viner, a pediatrician and member of the UK Government’s scientific advisory group SAGE, said it was crucial the UK does not ‘rush to a decision’ in the wake of the announcement in the US.

http://archive.today/2021.10.27-181525/https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10135699/Experts-urge-UK-steer-clear-vaccinating-children-moves-closer-jabbing-FIVE-year-olds.html

Tags CDC, Children, COVID-19, Daily Mail, FDA, Herd Immunity, Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation, Medical Experts, MHRA, Myocarditis, Pfizer, Professor David Livermore, Professor Paul Hunter, Professor Russell Viner, SAGE, Side-effects, UK, University of East Anglia, Vaccination, Vaccine Damage

Info This site is a curated archive of articles with a link to the source. Keywords and topics covered in the publication can be found above. Click on the tag to view a listing of similar articles.
Links Are any links broken? The page may have been taken down. Visit archive.is or archive.org to view the archive snapshot.
Links Help fight censorship and preserve information on the internet. Archive this source and links on archive.is and archive.org. Save a local copy on your own hard drive.